Skip navigation

Student 2.0 would perform better in Open-Book/Open-Internet Examinations. This allows for assessing Higher Cognitive Abilities. But the traditionalist in us says no to Student 2.0.
student 2.0 sees the need to democratise higher education. They believe in the philosophy of connectivist pedagogies.
Unfortunately, when we provide training, we rarely conduct an evaluation of prior knowledge to inform the training.
(Teacher ICT Readiness in Ghana, Kofi B. Boakye, Dzigbodi Ama Banini p5)

Student 2.0 subscribes to the questioning dimension, reinventing Socrates. They do not accept as sacrosanct
theories without scrutiny, they identify with the concept of negotiated meaning and adhere to collaborative learning practices…

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: